WCAG 3.0 release date: status, timeline and what to do now

WCAG 3.0 has no release date. It is a W3C Working Draft, last published on September 10, 2026, not a Recommendation, and W3C says it is not expected to be a completed standard for a few more years. W3C also says it will not supersede WCAG 2, and advises meeting WCAG 2.2 now.

Published . Last reviewed .

The facts about WCAG 3 on this page were read on October 11, 2026 from W3C's WCAG 3 introduction, which W3C last updated on September 25, 2026, from the Working Draft of September 10, 2026 and from the working group's schedule. The draft is changing, so check the dates on those pages before relying on anything here.

Where WCAG 3.0 stands today

The status of WCAG 3.0 as of October 11, 2026, with the W3C page behind each answer
Question Answer Source
What is it? W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0, a newer standard than WCAG 2 that is still in draft, with a different structure, a different conformance model and a broader scope. W3C, WCAG 3 introduction
What stage is it at? A W3C Working Draft, dated September 10, 2026. It is not a Recommendation, which is what W3C calls a finished web standard. W3C Working Draft, September 10, 2026
How does W3C describe it? An "incomplete draft that will change." The final requirements will differ from the draft's, with guidelines and requirements edited, added, combined and removed. W3C, WCAG 3 introduction
Can it be cited as a standard? No. The draft's status section says it may be updated, replaced or obsoleted at any time, that publishing a Working Draft does not imply W3C endorsement, and that it is inappropriate to cite it as other than a work in progress. Working Draft, status of this document
How complete is the draft? It includes only requirements that have reached "developing" status. Requirements still at "exploratory" status are left to the Editor's Draft. The draft says it still has several years of work. Working Draft, section 1.1

Each section of the draft carries one of five statuses: placeholder, exploratory, developing, refining or mature. Developing means the content has been roughly agreed in terms of what is needed, although not all high-level concerns are settled and the details are still to be worked out. Refining is the stage the draft describes as ready for wide public review and experimental adoption.

W3C describes the path a technical report takes to become a standard as a Working Draft, then a Wide Review Working Draft, then a Candidate Recommendation, then a W3C Recommendation (W3C WAI, how WAI develops standards). WCAG 3 is at the first of those stages.

When will WCAG 3.0 be released?

No W3C source gives a release date for WCAG 3 as a finished standard, and we do not give one either. Here is what the sources do say about timing.

What W3C and the WCAG 3 working group say about timing, and how much weight each statement carries
Source What it says Weight
WCAG 3 introduction, updated September 25, 2026 WCAG 3 "is not expected to be a completed W3C standard for a few more years." It also says WCAG 3 is intended to develop into a W3C Standard in a few years. It gives no date. W3C's stated expectation.
Working Draft, September 10, 2026 The draft has moved closer toward completion, but it "still has several years of work." The editors' own estimate, without a date.
Working group schedule on GitHub, last edited September 10, 2026 Lists publishing WCAG 3 as a Candidate Recommendation Snapshot as a 2027 objective, in its fourth-quarter 2027 row. Notes that, historically, it has taken about two more years from that stage to final publication. Plans an updated working draft in December 2026 and another in the second quarter of 2027. Shows an updated draft planned for the second quarter of 2026 as having slipped to the beginning of September. A working plan. The page says it is edited by working group participants, does not necessarily represent consensus and may have incorrect information.

W3C's introduction links to that GitHub page as the group's projected schedule, so it is the closest thing to a timeline that exists. It is a plan, not a commitment, and one of its dates has already moved. We do not add its Candidate Recommendation objective and its two-year note together into a date for final publication, because nothing in the sources does that. For planning, the useful conclusion is simpler: there is no finished WCAG 3 to conform to today, and W3C says there will not be for a few more years.

Draft history since January 2021

The clearest evidence of pace is how often drafts have appeared. W3C's publication history for WCAG 3.0 lists 10 publications since January 21, 2021, the first a First Public Working Draft and the other nine Working Drafts.

Every publication of WCAG 3.0 listed by W3C, oldest first
Date Type
January 21, 2021First Public Working Draft
June 8, 2021Working Draft
December 7, 2021Working Draft
July 24, 2023Working Draft
May 16, 2024Working Draft
May 28, 2024Working Draft
December 12, 2024Working Draft
September 4, 2025Working Draft
March 3, 2026Working Draft
September 10, 2026Working Draft

Will WCAG 3 replace WCAG 2?

W3C says WCAG 3 "will not supersede WCAG 2." It adds that WCAG 2 will not be deprecated until several years after WCAG 3 is finalized, and that it will provide guidance on moving from WCAG 2 to WCAG 3 once WCAG 3 is more stable (W3C, WCAG 3 introduction). The Working Draft makes the same point in plain language: WCAG 3 does not replace WCAG 2, and WCAG 2 will still be required by different countries for a long time to come. The draft also calls WCAG 3 "a successor to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2 and previous versions, but does not deprecate WCAG 2." W3C's own text therefore uses both "successor" and "will not supersede," and in both WCAG 2 is not deprecated. It expects that some organizations will keep using WCAG 2 while others migrate.

The current standard is WCAG 2.2, a W3C Recommendation since October 5, 2023 and updated on December 12, 2024, which is also ISO/IEC 40500:2025 (W3C, WCAG overview).

What changes in WCAG 3

W3C says WCAG 3 will have similar accessibility requirements to WCAG 2, with a different structure, a different conformance model and a broader scope. The draft's own description of the differences:

WCAG 2.2 compared with the WCAG 3.0 Working Draft of September 10, 2026 (the draft will change)
Aspect WCAG 2.2 WCAG 3.0 Working Draft
Status W3C Recommendation (October 5, 2023, updated December 12, 2024) Working Draft (September 10, 2026)
Name Web Content Accessibility Guidelines W3C Accessibility Guidelines. W3C kept the "WCAG" acronym for its familiarity and to cover a scope broader than content.
Scope Web content Web content, apps, tools, publishing and emerging technologies
Building blocks 4 principles, 13 guidelines (goals that are not testable) and 86 success criteria Guidelines written as outcome statements, with core requirements, supplemental requirements, assertions and recommended practices
Granularity 86 success criteria The draft says its list of requirements is longer than WCAG 2's list of success criteria, because requirements are more granular and the list is meant to be inclusive
Supporting material Understanding documents and Techniques "How to Document" and "Methods," which W3C describes as somewhat similar
Conformance One of three cumulative levels: A, AA or AAA, for full pages Content must meet all core requirements. Each core requirement is tagged physical harm, risk, barrier or friction
Reporting beyond a pass Authors may report progress toward criteria at higher levels Six reporting tiers: 1 (physical harm and risk), 2 (plus barrier), 3 (plus friction, which is conformance), then 4 to 6 adding supplemental requirements and assertions, with the counts still to be determined

Two details in the draft are worth knowing because they come up in coverage of WCAG 3. First, the draft's reporting table labels tiers 4, 5 and 6 Bronze, Silver and Gold, and an editor's note says the group is exploring tiers and an alternative proposal that uses scoring, inviting public comment on which shows more promise. Expect the conformance model to keep changing. Second, the draft says content that conforms to WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA is expected to meet "most of the minimum conformance level" of WCAG 3, but that WCAG 3 includes additional tests and different scoring, so additional work will be needed for full conformance. No one can say how large that work will be while the requirements are still moving.

For what WCAG 2.2 requires at each level, see WCAG A vs AA vs AAA.

What explains why no law references WCAG 3

This page is general information, not legal advice. None of the laws in our table of laws and the WCAG version each names refers to WCAG 3. Its rows name WCAG 2.0, 2.1 or 2.2, name no version, or point to the "most current" or "latest" version of WCAG, as New York State's law and the Australian federal Digital Inclusion Standard do. How wording like that applies once WCAG 3 is a Recommendation is a question for a lawyer, and W3C says WCAG 3 will not supersede WCAG 2.

We have found no regulator that says why. These facts are consistent with it:

  • It is a draft. W3C says it is inappropriate to cite the Working Draft as anything other than a work in progress.
  • WCAG 2 stays in force. The draft says WCAG 2 will still be required by different countries for a long time to come.
  • Standards bodies are moving to WCAG 2.2. ETSI published EN 301 549 v4.1.1, aligned to WCAG 2.2, on September 2, 2026, although the EU still applies v3.2.1 until the new version is cited in the Official Journal (AccessibleEU). UK public sector guidance names WCAG 2.2 Level AA.

See web accessibility laws worldwide and EN 301 549 explained for the position by jurisdiction, and the accessibility law updates log for changes as they happen.

What to do now

  1. Meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA

    W3C's introduction says the best way to prepare for WCAG 3 is to meet the WCAG 2.2 success criteria now. WCAG 2.2 Level AA includes the criteria of the WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 versions that the laws in our table name (see the 4.1.1 caveat on which WCAG version the law requires), but read the source for the law that applies to you. Start with the WCAG 2.2 checklist, the full criteria list and what is new in WCAG 2.2.

  2. Keep a record per criterion

    W3C says it will provide transition support materials for WCAG 3, which may use mapping. Our reading is that a record of what you tested against each WCAG 2.2 criterion, and how, is the easiest thing to map later. What a website accessibility audit contains covers scope and method, and how much of WCAG can be automated shows which criteria need a person to test.

  3. Treat "WCAG 3 ready" claims with care

    There is no final standard to conform to. The FTC's final order against accessiBe (April 2025, $1,000,000) concerned claims that a product would make a website meet WCAG, which the complaint charged were false or unsubstantiated (FTC). A claim to meet a draft that W3C says will change has nothing fixed to be measured against. See overlays and the FTC.

  4. Follow the draft from W3C's pages

    W3C suggests reading the WCAG 3.0 explainer before the draft itself. W3C says it will update its introduction page regularly, and WAI announces Working Drafts for review by email, LinkedIn, Mastodon and feed (Subscribe to WAI News). If you want to comment on the draft, W3C asks for separate issues in the WCAG 3 GitHub repository, or an email to public-agwg-comments@w3.org if GitHub is not feasible.

What we don't claim

We do not predict when WCAG 3 will be finished, and we do not know what its final requirements will be. We have left out every date that does not come from a W3C page or the working group's own schedule, and the schedule itself says it may be wrong. Nothing here means a site is ready for WCAG 3, and no scan, audit or checklist from GotAlt or anyone else can make it so. See our editorial policy for how we source and correct pages like this one.

Questions about WCAG 3.0

When will WCAG 3.0 be released?

W3C has not set a release date. Its introduction page says WCAG 3 is not expected to be a completed standard for a few more years. The working group's own schedule on GitHub lists a Candidate Recommendation Snapshot as a 2027 objective and notes that final publication has historically taken about two more years after that stage, but the page says it may contain incorrect information and one date on it has already moved. Plan around WCAG 2.2.

Is WCAG 3.0 a W3C Recommendation?

No. It is a Working Draft, and the latest version is dated September 10, 2026. A technical report passes through Working Draft, Wide Review Working Draft and Candidate Recommendation stages before it becomes a Recommendation, and WCAG 3 is at the first. The draft's status section says it is inappropriate to cite it as other than a work in progress.

Will WCAG 3 replace WCAG 2.2?

W3C says no. WCAG 3 will not supersede WCAG 2, and WCAG 2 will not be deprecated until several years after WCAG 3 is finalized. The draft adds that WCAG 2 will still be required by different countries for a long time to come.

Does any law require WCAG 3?

None of the laws in our table of laws and the WCAG versions they name refers to WCAG 3. They name WCAG 2.0, 2.1 or 2.2, name no version, or point to the most current or latest version. Read the source for the law that applies to you.

If I meet WCAG 2.2 AA, am I ready for WCAG 3?

W3C's advice is that meeting the WCAG 2.2 success criteria now is the best preparation. The Working Draft expects content that conforms to WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA to meet most of WCAG 3's minimum conformance level, with additional work needed for full conformance. Because the requirements are still changing, no one can say how large that work will be.

What are Bronze, Silver and Gold in WCAG 3?

In the September 10, 2026 Working Draft, tiers 4, 5 and 6 of the reporting table are labeled Bronze, Silver and Gold. They sit above the third tier, which is conformance, and the number of supplemental requirements and assertions at each is still to be determined. The draft also describes a scoring alternative, so treat the labels as provisional.

Should I wait for WCAG 3 before fixing accessibility problems?

No. WCAG 2.2 is the current Recommendation, the laws in our table name WCAG 2.0, 2.1 or 2.2, and W3C advises meeting WCAG 2.2 now. Fixes for text alternatives, keyboard access and contrast help the people who use your site today.

Start with what you can check today

The free scan runs 16 rule-based checks on up to three pages and maps each finding to a WCAG success criterion, so you can begin on WCAG 2.2 now. No signup.

Scan my site for free See a real report first